In a nuclear war, safety depends on factors such as proximity to military targets, prevailing winds, geography, and infrastructure. In Washington State, certain areas may be less vulnerable to the direct effects of a nuclear conflict compared to others. Here are a few areas that could be considered safer:
Eastern Washington
- Reasoning: This region is farther from major military targets like naval bases (e.g., Naval Base Kitsap) and Seattle, which would be primary targets due to their strategic and economic importance. Eastern Washington is more rural and has fewer high-profile targets.
- Notable Areas: Spokane, Pullman, Walla Walla, Tri-Cities.
- Advantages: Less population density and fewer critical infrastructure targets. The lack of large military bases and industrial hubs makes this area less likely to be targeted by nuclear strikes.
North Cascades & Olympic Mountains
- Reasoning: The remote, mountainous regions of the North Cascades and the Olympic Mountains offer natural protection. These areas are far from major urban centers and military bases, and the geography could potentially shield people from radiation fallout and blast waves.
- Notable Areas: Areas near Mount Baker, North Cascades National Park, and parts of Olympic National Park.
- Advantages: These areas are less populated and more isolated, which could provide a buffer from the immediate aftermath of a nuclear strike. Being higher in elevation might offer some protection from fallout.