- Congressman claims voter ID laws will prevent women from voting, especially those who changed names after marriage
- Host argues getting an ID is not that difficult, citing examples like getting a driver’s license or COVID vaccine passport
- Debate over whether voter ID is necessary, with claims it’s already a constitutional requirement to be a citizen to vote
The Unbelievable Arguments Against Voter ID: A Conversation Worth Hearing
Tony Katz is tackling a topic that’s got everyone talking: the SAVE Act, also known as the Save America Act. But what’s really going on here? Are we talking about voter ID, or are we talking about something more? Congressman Andre Carson from Indianapolis thinks that requiring voter ID is a way to “dismantle our electoral process.” But is that really what’s at stake?
Congressman Andre Carson’s argument is that voter ID laws will prevent women from voting, particularly those who’ve changed their last names after marriage. He claims that these women are too busy to get an ID,
but we’ve all been through the process of getting a driver’s license or a passport – it’s not that hard. As our host points out, “Mothers don’t have the time to get an ID? Did they have time to get COVID shots and carry COVID paperwork to prove they had a shot so they could get into a museum or a movie theater?” It’s a valid question…