Gregory “Greg” Bovino, the Border Patrol commander whose agents swept through Charlotte last November, could be back in the Queen City soon, only this time inside a federal courtroom. Defense filings in the Western District of North Carolina say lawyers want Bovino called as a witness in the case of Miguel Angel Garcia Martinez, the Charlotte man arrested after photographing immigration agents. If the court signs off, Bovino would appear here as a witness under oath instead of a commander on the street.
Defense Wants Agents’ Messages and Bovino Under Oath
Federal public defenders have asked the court to order up communications from agents’ personal devices and told a magistrate they intend to call Bovino to explain who authorized the pursuit that ended with Martinez’s arrest. According to the filings, prosecutors initially tried to add a sentencing enhancement by arguing Martinez used his van as a “deadly or dangerous weapon,” but a magistrate rejected that attempt. The court papers also include cellphone footage that the defense says shows agents discussing plans to “smash” into the van and making celebratory remarks during the chase, according to the Charlotte Observer.
Bovino Already a Lightning Rod Figure
Bovino became the public face of the administration’s urban enforcement push, a high-profile commander who led deployments in cities from Chicago to Charlotte and Minneapolis, and he was demoted in late January following fallout over a Jan. 24 fatal shooting. That timing makes the possibility of his Charlotte courtroom appearance especially charged. His tactics, and his public defenses of agents, have drawn scrutiny from judges and civil-rights groups that question whether some of the operations go beyond acceptable limits, according to The Washington Post.
Video Sits at the Center of the Fight
What the Law Puts on the Line
Martinez is charged in federal court with assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers in the Western District of North Carolina. Whether a vehicle qualifies as a “deadly or dangerous weapon” is at the heart of the prosecutors’ attempted enhancement. Under federal law, using a deadly or dangerous weapon in an offense against federal officers, or inflicting bodily injury, can sharply increase possible penalties, in some cases allowing sentences of up to 20 years, according to Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute…