The Cincinnati police chief, Teresa Theetge, appeared before Sheryl Long for a pre-disciplinary hearing following months of investigation into her leadership.
The hearing marks a critical step in a process that could result in disciplinary action, including termination.
According to reports by WLWT and WCPO, the meeting lasted about two hours and concluded without a final decision. Theetge has been on paid administrative leave since October 2025. City officials have not provided a timeline for when a decision will be made. The case has drawn attention across Cincinnati’s government and law enforcement community.
Cincinnati police chief discipline hearing details
The Cincinnati police chief discipline hearing stems from an independent review commissioned by the city. The report, based on interviews with more than 30 witnesses, raised concerns about Theetge’s leadership style and effectiveness. According to reporting by Local 12 News, the review concluded that she had not been an effective leader. Witnesses cited issues such as communication breakdowns and challenges in managing departmental operations. Some accounts also described a workplace culture that discouraged dissent. The findings formed the basis for the pre-disciplinary process now underway.
City Manager Long is responsible for determining the outcome of the Cincinnati police chief discipline hearing. The process allows Theetge to respond directly to each allegation before any action is taken. This step is standard in administrative proceedings involving senior city officials. It ensures that both the investigation’s findings and the chief’s defense are considered. Officials have emphasized that no final conclusions have been reached. The decision will follow a review of all materials presented during the hearing.
Cincinnati police chief responds to allegations
The Cincinnati police chief strongly disputed the claims outlined in the report during the hearing. Her attorney, Stephen Imm, said she addressed every accusation in detail. He stated that she “eviscerated every accusation,” arguing that the claims lacked merit. According to coverage from Fox19, her legal team described the report as flawed and misleading. The defense also suggested that some criticisms may have been influenced by internal disagreements within the department…