2 doctors share views on Amendment G

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) – South Dakota residents will vote on whether or not to establish a right to abortion in the state constitution come November 5.

Amendment G is one of four constitutional amendments people will be voting on.

Two women who’ve practiced medicine in South Dakota explain why residents should and shouldn’t vote for Amendment G.

Be informed on the seven 2024 ballot measures

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3iWFbP_0wQ9f1Vy00

Dr. Amy Kelly, a Sioux Falls OB-GYN who supports Amendment G, shares her view on how the current law impacts her job.

“The vagueness of that law has really put myself and other OB-GYNs and health care providers who take care of pregnant women in a sticky spot because no one has on their forehead when something goes from being just bad to life-threatening,” Kelly said.

On the opposition with Life Defense Fund, Dr. Patti Giebink says people shouldn’t vote for G because its wording is too vague.

“Under this amendment, it says there can be no regulations. None, zero. It really doesn’t prohibit anything. And I think this amendment is too extreme. I think that South Dakota can do better if we want to make exceptions, we can do that through the legislature,” Giebink said.

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS