Additional Coverage:
- 71 organizations and counting have signed a letter warning Mark Zuckerberg about ending fact-checking on Meta in the US (newsbreak.com)
Fact-Checkers Slam Meta’s Crowdsourcing Shift
Fact-checking organizations are condemning Meta’s decision to move to crowdsourced fact-checking in the US. The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) has issued a warning, calling the move a “step backward” for accuracy.
A group of 71 fact-checkers signed an open letter expressing their concerns. They argue that the change will prioritize untrustworthy information online. Meta’s announcement came with less than an hour’s notice, potentially harming organizations that rely on Meta for revenue.
Crowdsourcing with Experts
IFCN proposes a compromise, suggesting that Meta combine crowdsourcing with professional fact-checkers. They believe this “new model” could address the need for accurate information on social media platforms.
Financial Impact and Potential Harm
Meta’s move could have financial repercussions for fact-checking organizations. IFCN warns that ending the fact-checking program globally could lead to “real-world harm in many places.” Meta has not yet announced plans to do so.
Industry Perspective
Advertisers do not anticipate the changes harming Meta’s business, as the company holds a significant share of the US digital ad market. Meta has not commented on the situation.