Additional Coverage:
A trial begins Monday in North Dakota that could determine the fate of Greenpeace USA. Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline, is suing the environmental group, claiming protests against the pipeline caused significant delays and cost overruns.
The pipeline, completed in 2017, transports oil from North Dakota to Illinois. Protests, largely led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, erupted over concerns about sacred sites, water supply, and inadequate tribal consultation. The protests drew international attention and resulted in numerous clashes with law enforcement.
Energy Transfer alleges Greenpeace spread misinformation, solicited donations to fund violent protests, and damaged company property. Greenpeace denies these claims, stating its role in the protests was limited and that the lawsuit aims to suppress free speech.
Energy Transfer co-founder Kelcy Warren has publicly stated Greenpeace will “pay” for the alleged damages. This aggressive stance is unusual for a corporate executive, according to legal experts. Warren maintains the protests caused significant harm to the company.
Greenpeace argues the lawsuit is a “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation” (SLAPP) designed to silence critics. The group fears a loss could lead to financial ruin, but remains optimistic about the outcome. They emphasize the importance of deterring similar lawsuits against environmental activism.
The trial is expected to last five weeks, with jury selection beginning Monday. Both sides appear firmly entrenched in their positions, making a settlement unlikely.
An appeal is anticipated regardless of the verdict. Hundreds of environmental and other organizations have voiced support for Greenpeace, pledging to continue advocating for environmental protection.