Additional Coverage:
Canton Jury Speaks Out: “Sloppy Police Work” Led to Read Acquittal
In an exclusive interview with ABC News, a juror from the Karen Read trial revealed the reasons behind the not guilty verdict, citing a “sloppy police investigation” as the main factor. The juror, who wishes to remain anonymous, stated unequivocally, “a collision did not occur,” referencing the prosecution’s claim that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, with her vehicle.
This juror’s account sheds light on the jury’s deliberations, suggesting that the prosecution failed to convincingly link Read to the scene. When asked about O’Keefe’s cause of death, the juror emphasized that determining this was beyond the jury’s scope, stating their focus was solely on the evidence presented.
She noted that O’Keefe’s injuries appeared consistent with a dog bite, echoing the defense’s argument that O’Keefe was injured in an altercation at the home where his body was later found. The juror went on to criticize the police investigation, suggesting the possibility of tampering, or simply poor investigative work, ultimately concluding that a more thorough investigation could have definitively proven or disproven the prosecution’s case.
The homeowners, Brian and Nicole Albert, vehemently deny that O’Keefe ever entered their home that night. They recounted the harrowing moment they learned of his death, describing their shock and disbelief. “I would have taken a bullet for John O’Keefe,” Brian Albert shared, expressing his deep sadness over the loss.
The juror also offered insight into the dramatic moment when the judge initially announced a verdict, only to retract it minutes later. According to the juror, one member of the jury had second thoughts, prompting further deliberation before a final, unanimous verdict could be reached.
The juror emphasized that the group wanted to ensure every member felt “settled and comfortable with their choice.” Ultimately, reasonable doubt stemming from various pieces of evidence, not just one single factor, led to the acquittal.
Another juror, Paula Prado, speaking to ABC News’ Boston affiliate WCVB, confirmed the presence of “too many holes” in the prosecution’s case. Prado, who initially leaned towards a manslaughter conviction, changed her mind over the course of the trial, citing a lack of evidence placing Read at the scene beyond dropping O’Keefe off.
The anonymous juror also described Read as actively engaged in her own defense, constantly taking notes and conferring with her lawyers.
The Massachusetts State Police released a statement offering condolences to O’Keefe’s family and acknowledging the need for internal review and improvement in their investigative procedures. They committed to enhanced training, oversight, and accountability going forward.