Additional Coverage:
US Fertility Rate Hits Record Low, But Experts Say No Need to Panic
The US fertility rate dipped to a historic low of 1.599 children per woman in 2024, according to newly released federal data. This means the US joins the ranks of other developed nations with fertility rates below the replacement level of 2.1 children per woman. While the rate has been declining for nearly two decades, this new low has sparked renewed discussion about the future of population growth in the US.
The Trump administration has previously expressed concern over falling birth rates and has taken steps to address the issue. These include initiatives aimed at expanding access to and lowering the cost of in vitro fertilization and exploring the concept of “baby bonuses.”
However, some experts believe the situation is less dire than it appears. Leslie Root, a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder specializing in fertility and population policy, notes that the declining fertility rate is part of a larger trend of delayed childbearing. She emphasizes that the US population continues to grow, with births still exceeding deaths.
The data, released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), reveals a nuanced picture. While the overall fertility rate declined, the total number of births actually increased by 1% in 2024, totaling just over 3.6 million.
This apparent contradiction is attributed to recalculations based on updated Census population estimates. As the population of women of childbearing age increases, potentially due to immigration, it offsets smaller increases in births within specific age groups.
Karen Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina, points out that financial concerns, access to healthcare, and the desire for a stable environment play a significant role in family planning decisions. She suggests that the current political climate and economic anxieties may be contributing factors to the declining birth rates.
Guzzo also questions the effectiveness of the Trump administration’s initiatives, arguing that they fail to address fundamental needs like parental leave and affordable childcare. She believes these policies are largely symbolic and unlikely to significantly impact the choices of most Americans.