A state transportation report revealed that Salt Lake City’s lane reduction projects completed over the past decade have had little effect on traffic patterns.
Why it matters: The findings by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) could invite more scrutiny from state lawmakers and spur action to assert further control over city roads.
The big picture: A push for safer streets by trading car lanes for bike paths and pedestrian walkways across U.S. cities has been met with criticism from conservatives who say such measures deprioritize drivers.
- The issue sparked wide debate this past legislative session.
State of play: The study was mandated by one of multiple controversial state laws passed this year that Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall has said undermine local authority.
- The law requires Salt Lake City to receive approval from UDOT before moving forward with road projects.
What they’re saying: Mendenhall told a legislative interim committee this week that the analysis identified “great areas for improvement,” including how the city engages with the community at every stage of road work.
- While traffic slowed down during the COVID-19 era, the analysis found that activity has since returned to prepandemic levels.
- The analysis recommends that state and city officials update the city’s traffic signal system, which can contribute to long delays and hasn’t received a major update since 2018.
- “There’s a certain angst that I see around the entire state right now,” UDOT executive director Carlos Braceras told the committee, pointing to resident concerns over rapid growth and the impact on traffic.
By the numbers: A survey launched by UDOT that ran from July to August found people were evenly divided on the city’s road projects, with 41% carrying a positive view vs. 40% with a negative one…