Publishers Sue Florida Over School Book Ban Law

Additional Coverage:

Orlando, Florida — In the book collection of 16-year-old Jack Hayes, there are titles like the renowned “Slaughterhouse-Five” by Kurt Vonnegut, which might be inaccessible in some Florida school libraries due to recent legislation.

Judi Hayes, Jack’s mother, expressed to CBS News her concerns about the 2023 Florida statute that restricts certain books in educational settings, complicating her son’s learning experience. She emphasized that the issue isn’t about overly explicit content but about educational classics like “Anna Karenina” and “War and Peace.”

A group including Penguin Random House, along with other publishers and authors, has initiated a federal lawsuit claiming that the law infringes on First Amendment rights by imposing severe censorship in educational institutions.

The legislation allows any Florida resident to contest the presence of books in school libraries across their county if they contain sexual content, necessitating the removal of the disputed book within five school days pending a resolution.

Notable literary works such as Maya Angelou’s “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” and Ernest Hemingway’s “For Whom the Bell Tolls” have been removed following this law.

A report by Pen America indicated that between July 2021 and December 2023, Florida recorded the highest number of book bans in the country, with 3,135 instances across 11 districts.

Author Laurie Halse Anderson, whose work “Speak” addresses sexual assault and was also banned, articulated her viewpoint stating that while parents have the right to control what their own children read, they shouldn’t determine the reading material for others.

The lawsuit has named the Florida Board of Education as the defendant. In response, Sydney Booker, a spokesperson for the Florida Department of Education, described the situation as a publicity stunt, asserting that Florida does not ban books but merely excludes sexually explicit content from schools.

Governor Ron DeSantis, who supported the legislation, stated that the measures aren’t about banning books but about making appropriate educational judgments. Jack Hayes, reflecting on the situation, argued that politics should not interfere with educational content, advocating for unrestricted access to books for students who wish to read them.


Read More About This Story:

TRENDING NOW