Additional Coverage:
Female Veterans Decry Remarks Against Women in Combat
Despite serving in combat, leading convoys, and enduring multiple deployments, female veterans and service members are expressing outrage over Pete Hegseth’s comments suggesting that women should not be in combat roles.
Hegseth, a potential defense secretary pick, claims that women are not as capable as men in combat and their presence complicates fighting. However, female soldiers refute this, stating that they undergo the same training, take the same oath, and execute the same orders as their male counterparts.
Female veterans argue that excluding women from combat would harm recruitment and retention, as it could deter potential soldiers and those already serving. They highlight that women have served with distinction in Iraq and Afghanistan, with many receiving combat badges and Purple Hearts.
Concerns about Hegseth’s Selection
Beyond his stance on women in combat, Hegseth’s selection has also raised concerns due to an alleged sexual assault investigation in 2017. The Trump transition team maintains that Hegseth denies the accusations and has nominated highly qualified individuals.
Senator Tammy Duckworth, a Purple Heart recipient who lost her legs in combat, strongly opposes Hegseth’s nomination, calling it “dangerous.” She emphasizes that modern warfare requires soldiers of all genders to be on the front lines.
Retired Army Lt. Col.
Raquel Durden believes that the military should maintain high standards for combat roles regardless of gender. She argues that a blanket ban on women in combat is unrealistic, given their proven abilities and contributions.