Additional Coverage:
Kate Middleton: The Modern Face of the Monarchy
Royal experts attribute Kate Middleton’s success as a royal to her adherence to tradition and avoidance of rebellious behavior, unlike her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana. Author Edward White, whose new book “Dianaworld: An Obsession” explores Diana’s lasting impact, notes the key difference in their approaches to royal life.
Diana, engaged at 19, entered the royal family young and sheltered. Kate, on the other hand, married Prince William at 29, a more mature age that White suggests was a conscious decision.
He believes this reflects a learned lesson from Diana’s life: avoid rushing into royalty.
White contrasts Diana’s life to that of a pop star, thrust into fame at a young age and defined by it. Kate, with her non-royal upbringing, met William at the University of St.
Andrews. Their relationship, initially as friends and housemates, blossomed into romance.
Kate’s path involved navigating media scrutiny, enduring tabloid nicknames like “Waity Katie,” and a brief split with William. This stands in stark contrast to Diana’s sudden immersion into the spotlight as “Shy Di,” which ultimately led to her becoming an unconventional figure within the royal family.
Diana modernized the monarchy through her personal touch, interacting intimately with the public in ways that set a precedent for future royals. However, her life was marked by marital struggles with Prince Charles and his infidelity with Camilla Parker Bowles, as well as a feeling of isolation within the palace. White suggests that Diana’s response to press scrutiny was a product of her circumstances and lack of guidance, unlike Kate’s more composed approach.
Several royal commentators agree that Kate benefits from a robust support system, something Diana lacked. British broadcaster Helena Chard emphasizes the contrast between the strained relationship of Charles and Diana and the strong partnership of William and Kate.
Chard praises Kate’s inherent strength, confidence, and understanding of her future role. Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner agrees, highlighting William’s crucial role in supporting Kate’s navigation of royal life, unlike Diana who felt stifled by royal constraints and ultimately rebelled.
He recounts witnessing Diana and Charles competing for public attention, with Diana, the “People’s Princess,” consistently winning.
Chard also points out that Diana confided in the wrong people, leading to incidents like the controversial BBC interview, which William and Harry later criticized for its deceitful acquisition. Diana’s tragic death in a car accident while being pursued by paparazzi further underscores the intense pressures she faced.
Royal expert Hilary Fordwich emphasizes Kate’s preparedness and resilience, attributing it to her age, support system, and measured approach to media scrutiny. Fordwich also commends Kate’s handling of public image challenges and her balance of transparency and privacy.
The consensus among experts is that the future of the monarchy appears promising, a prospect that Diana might have appreciated. Chard notes the shared qualities of sparkle, affinity for children, and deep love for their children between Diana and Kate, suggesting a legacy continued.