Additional Coverage:
“Alligator Alcatraz” Detention Center’s Legal Status Debated in Court
A federal judge heard arguments Monday on the legal conditions at the “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center, a makeshift facility located in the Florida Everglades. Judge Rodolfo Ruiz II considered detainee access to attorneys, the designated immigration court for detainees, and whether the case was filed in the correct jurisdiction. While acknowledging “a lot of changes on the ground” at the facility, Judge Ruiz did not issue an immediate ruling or grant the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction.
The ACLU, representing the plaintiffs, argued that the situation at “Alligator Alcatraz” is dire, alleging significant harm to detainees and inadequate access to legal counsel. They claim the center lacks sufficient resources for confidential attorney-client communication. The government countered, stating that attorney access has been steadily improving as the facility develops, with dedicated private meeting rooms now available.
A key point of contention was the designated immigration court for the detainees. While the government recently assigned the Krome North Service Processing Center in Miami this responsibility, the ACLU expressed skepticism about the permanence of this solution.
The state and federal government, both defendants in the case, also challenged the Miami court’s jurisdiction over the case, arguing the detention center itself is outside its purview. Judge Ruiz acknowledged this “significant concern” but noted that one federal defendant, Miami ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations head Garrett Ripa, falls within the court’s district.
The government downplayed Ripa’s role, but Judge Ruiz highlighted an agreement between the state and federal government assigning supervisory responsibilities, including protecting attorney-client privilege, to the Miami office. While the government maintained that any supervision occurs at the facility itself, outside the district, Judge Ruiz reiterated his belief that the case, at least regarding the federal defendants, is in the correct court.
The judge then shifted his focus to the state’s role, questioning the proper venue for the state defendants. While the ACLU argued for the Miami court based on prior agreements, the judge expressed doubt, observing that the state appears to operate “Alligator Alcatraz” independently of federal input. He emphasized the need for a prompt ruling on the venue issue to avoid further delays.
The ACLU seeks to ensure detainees’ constitutional rights are upheld, including access to legal representation and the ability to petition for release. The Department of Homeland Security denies the allegations, asserting that the facility provides attorney meeting spaces and email communication options.
The “Alligator Alcatraz” facility has drawn controversy since its inception, with reports of harsh conditions, including overcrowding, insect infestations, and inadequate food. The state of Florida maintains the facility is in “good working order.” The ACLU also raised concerns about the potential for improper removal of detainees from the US.