US Has Only Eight Days of Weapons in a Fight With China, Palantir CTO Warns

Additional Coverage:

Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar Urges a New Approach to U.S. Military Deterrence: Focus on Production Capacity, Not Stockpiles

In a recent exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Shyam Sankar, Chief Technology Officer of Palantir Technologies, challenged the traditional American concept of military deterrence. Sankar argues that the U.S. has misunderstood what truly deters adversaries. Instead of relying on the size of its weapons stockpile, he says the real power lies in the ability to rapidly produce and replenish those weapons.

Reflecting on lessons from the conflict in Ukraine, Sankar emphasized that the decisive factor was not the existing arsenal but the manufacturing capacity behind it. “We thought it was the stockpile that would provide deterrence,” he said. “But Ukraine showed us that it’s actually the factory-the ability to generate the stockpile-that matters.”

Sankar noted with concern that current U.S. weapons production is too slow and limited, leaving the country vulnerable. In a potential conflict with China, he estimates the U.S. would have only about eight days’ worth of weapons readily available-a quantity unlikely to intimidate a determined adversary.

Drawing parallels to World War II, Sankar compared the U.S. and Germany’s production strategies. While Germany produced more advanced weapons, it lacked the volume that ultimately gave the Allies a decisive edge. Today, he warns, China excels in mass production, putting the U.S. at risk of falling behind in a similar way.

Central to Sankar’s argument is the transformative potential of artificial intelligence. By integrating AI into manufacturing, he believes the U.S. can empower its workforce, accelerate production, and reclaim its competitive advantage. “If AI gives the American worker superpowers,” Sankar said, “we can fix this imbalance.”

Sankar also dismissed the notion that the U.S. is a declining power, cautioning that China underestimates American resilience. “In our tradition, we may turn the other cheek repeatedly, but eventually, we will snap,” he remarked.

Highlighting the pitfalls of globalization, Sankar criticized the separation of innovation and production. “The central lie of globalization is that we can do the innovation and other folks do the production,” he explained. Over time, this has allowed countries like China to climb the technological ladder, eroding U.S. leadership.

He advocates for a strategic reshoring of industrial capabilities-not merely to replicate existing manufacturing processes, but to reinvent them. Sankar envisions a new industrial base powered by AI and innovation that strengthens national security and fuels economic vitality.

“We’re not going to re-industrialize symmetrically,” he said. “We’ll do it in entirely different ways that make the business case for bringing production back home.”

Sankar’s insights, detailed in his new book Mobilize: How to Reboot the American Industrial Base and Stop World War III, call for a fundamental reassessment of how the U.S. approaches defense and industrial policy in an era of intense global competition.


Read More About This Story:

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS