Jurors in federal court in Knoxville began deliberating Thursday on whether three people tied to Rocky Hill Pharmacy conspired to cash in on bogus prescriptions. The defendants, co-owners Tiffany Haney and Anne Warren, and pharmacy technician Tina Roper, have pleaded not guilty and told jurors they followed the rules and passed audits, even as prosecutors contend the operation pulled in millions.
Trial moves to the jury room
Closing arguments wrapped on Wednesday, and U.S. District Judge Thomas A. Varlan spent considerable time walking jurors through the law before sending them to the deliberation room, according to WBIR. The trial, which began Feb. 17 in U.S. District Court in Knoxville, featured testimony from prescribing clinicians and government witnesses who said some of the medicines at issue ran as high as $6,000 per prescription.
Prosecutors’ allegations
Federal prosecutors say the pharmacy’s owners used doctors’ and physician assistants’ names to obtain pricey medications from a specialty formulary and then billed drug plans for reimbursement. Court filings and reporting say the alleged scheme ran from about 2018 through 2024 and generated more than $8.5 million in reimbursements. The October 2024 indictment charged the co-owners with conspiracy to commit health care fraud, making false statements, and aggravated identity theft, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Tennessee.
Defense argues audits cleared the pharmacy
Defense attorneys have pushed back hard, saying multiple audits of the independent pharmacy turned up no problems and that insurers paid the claims without objection. They told jurors the business never saw the massive profits the government suggests and that the pharmacy made less than $20,000 during the period under scrutiny, while arguing that some clinician witnesses “lied on the stand,” per WBIR. Defense lawyers also said prosecutors leaned on an unindicted pharmacist to cooperate by raising the possibility of prosecution.
Counts pared back at trial
Over the course of the proceedings, the government dismissed multiple counts, and the prosecution rested its case before the defense began calling witnesses, narrowing the issues jurors must sort through. Those moves, along with the judge’s rulings on various motions, left the panel to focus on the core conspiracy and wire fraud allegations, as reported by WATE. The procedural shakeups clarified exactly what elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
Local fallout…