The Developer wants to shed the expensive dirty work of enforcement

Don’t residents get it? The Villages Developer will NEVER give away something that is not a problem or that doesn’t have costs attached. The ONLY reason they would pass on deed restrictions enforcement is because it’s unpopular and doesn’t generate revenue. I – like EVERY buyer in The Villages, signed a deed that was restricted BY the Developer and that named them as the responsible party for deed restrictions enforcement.

Why should we use our amenity fees to do THEIR work? What about associated legal fees? Who gets sued if something goes awry? How much time will District supervisors have to devote to solving problems associated is deed enforcement? Since the deeds name the Developer as responsible party, can District supervisors even legally take it over? What are the implications and problems inherent in federal housing laws that say age restricted communities must include opportunities for housing a certain percentage of residents who are NOT over 55…

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS