Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier insinuates that the drag show scheduled at the Saenger Theatre is somehow religious persecution and religious discrimination in his letter to the Pensacola City Council.
Uthmeier builds this narrative with these allegations:
- The show specifically targets Christianity for mockery.
- The city is platforming and endorsing this anti-Christian content.
- Using public property for anti-Christian speech constitutes government-sanctioned religious persecution.
- This persecution may amount to actionable religious discrimination.
Note the hedging: He says it “may amount to religious discrimination.” He also wrote that not cancelling the show “may subject the City to further legal scrutiny” – not that it definitively violates the law. Uthmeier knows this is legally shaky ground.
- The entire letter frames the issue as Christians versus the city government rather than what it actually is: some citizens objecting to constitutionally protected speech they find offensive. Read AGJU LTR to Pensacola_Final
What is Religious Discrimination?
Religious discrimination typically requires showing someone was treated differently because of their religion – denied employment, housing, services, or benefits. The AG cites in his footnotes:
- Florida Constitution art. I, §§ 2–3: General rights provisions and religious freedom protections.
- § 760.01(2), Fla. Stat.: Part of Florida’s Civil Rights Act covering employment and public accommodations discrimination.
Neither supports his theory that allowing critical speech about religion at a public venue constitutes discrimination.
The Fundamental Problems:
1. No Identifiable Victim: Who exactly is being discriminated against? Christians aren’t being denied access to the theater, city services, or any benefit. They’re simply offended by speech they find blasphemous.
2. Public Forum vs. Government Endorsement: The Saenger Theatre operates as a public forum rented to private performers. The city allowing the show isn’t endorsing its content any more than it endorses every concert, play, or event held there. If this theory held, the government could be sued for “discrimination” every time it allowed speech critical of any group on public property…