Supreme Court appears to favor Oregon city in dispute over homeless camping ban

A majority of Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared sympathetic to an Oregon city making it a crime for anyone without a permanent residence to sleep outside in an effort to crack down on homeless encampments across public properties.

The case, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, carries enormous stakes nationwide as communities confront a growing tide of unhoused residents and increasingly turn to punitive measures to try to incentivize people to take advantage of social services and other shelter options.

“These generally applicable laws prohibit specific conduct and are essential to public health and safety,” argued the city’s attorney Theane Evangelis during oral arguments, which stretched more than two and a half hours.

https://img.particlenews.com/image.php?url=3rZDkG_0sZmpsG900
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images – PHOTO: Homeless rights activists hold a rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court, Apr. 22, 2024, in Washington.

MORE: Supreme Court to decide if ban on homeless encampments is ‘cruel and unusual’

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said in a decision last year that a homeless camping ban amounts to “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th Amendment. But several members of the high court’s conservative majority took a critical view of that conclusion.

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS