Tennessee Law and the Decision to Destroy Dogs for Aggressive Behavior

In Tennessee, the laws governing the liability for dog bites and the destruction of certain dogs due to aggressive behavior are both complex and multifaceted. The state’s approach to these issues is characterized by a combination of strict liability rules and the traditional “one bite” doctrine, with various nuances and exceptions.

Tennessee’s Approach to Dog Bite Liability

Tennessee law stipulates a mixed system for dealing with dog bites. It encompasses both strict liability and a “one bite” rule, depending on the specifics of the incident. Under the strict liability provision, dog owners may be held liable for damages caused by their dogs in public places or private places where the plaintiff has permission to be. This means that the owner can be held responsible regardless of whether the dog has previously shown any dangerous propensities or whether the owner was aware of such tendencies​​​​​​.

Understanding the “One Bite” Rule

The “one bite” rule, a more traditional aspect of dog bite law, still holds relevance in Tennessee. Under this rule, a dog owner or keeper may be civilly liable for damages caused by their dog if the animal was known to be vicious or had a propensity to injure, and the owner was aware of this disposition. This rule typically applies in private places not covered by strict liability, such as the dog owner’s property. The victim must demonstrate that the owner knew or should have known about the dog’s dangerous tendencies​​​​.

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS