In a surprising twist, Republicans are now vocally supporting Texas Governor Greg Abbott’s decision to defy a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court. This stance represents a significant departure from traditional adherence to the principle that federal laws and court rulings take precedence over state laws.
This scenario echoes a contentious period in American history. Before the Civil War, there were instances where states claimed they were not bound by federal laws. The Constitution, however, has always maintained the supremacy of federal laws over state laws, as well as the necessity for states to comply with federal court decisions.
Despite this constitutional clarity, 25 Republican governors have backed Governor Abbott’s refusal to adhere to a Supreme Court decision. This ruling involved the federal government’s authority to remove razor wire installed by Texas at the southern border.
In their letter of support, these governors invoked the Constitution, specifically Article 4, Section 4, and Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3. They argue that due to the perceived failure of the Biden Administration to fulfill its constitutional duties, Texas has a legal justification to protect its sovereignty and that of the nation.