Latest 2025 Massachusetts Housing Market Data Identifies 18 Towns Retirees Are Actively Leaving in Massachusetts

When considering retirement in Massachusetts, it’s crucial to evaluate locations based on specific criteria that impact quality of life for retirees. Our analysis examines five key criteria: Overall Retirement Score, Walkability, Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities), Vibrant Score, and Transit-Friendly rating. These metrics help identify which communities may not be ideal for those seeking a peaceful retirement.

Every score presented in this ranking is based on extensive real-world data collection and surveys from residents who experience these communities daily. This is not subjective opinion but data-driven analysis of Massachusetts’s worst towns for retirees. The “Overall Retirement Score” has many criteria baked into it, providing a comprehensive assessment of each location’s retirement suitability.

Here’s the list.

18. Avon

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 34.00
  • Walkability: 64.11
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 81.61
  • Vibrant Score: 63.26
  • Transit-Friendly: 78.14

About Avon

Avon presents a mixed picture for retirees with a modest Overall Retirement Score of 34.00. While it offers decent Urban Sophistication at 81.61 and reasonable Transit-Friendly options rated at 78.14, its Walkability score of 64.11 may cause challenges for retirees looking to maintain independence without a vehicle. The median home price in Avon has been experiencing moderate growth compared to many Massachusetts communities, making it relatively more affordable than nearby suburban towns.

17. Malden

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 33.50
  • Walkability: 94.33
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 80.57
  • Vibrant Score: 81.42
  • Transit-Friendly: 85.64

About Malden

Malden scores poorly for retirement with an Overall Retirement Score of just 33.50, despite impressive scores in other categories. Its high Walkability (94.33), Urban Sophistication (80.57), and excellent Transit-Friendly rating (85.64) are offset by other retirement-specific factors. The town’s Vibrant Score of 81.42 indicates a busy, active community that may not provide the peaceful environment many retirees seek. Median home prices in Malden have been steadily increasing, making it a challenging market for those on fixed retirement incomes.

16. Taunton

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 33.47
  • Walkability: 71.92
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 50.55
  • Vibrant Score: 51.53
  • Transit-Friendly: 22.83

About Taunton

Taunton struggles as a retirement destination with an Overall Retirement Score of 33.47. The city has moderate Walkability at 71.92 but falls short in Transit-Friendly options with a low score of 22.83, making transportation a significant concern for senior residents who no longer drive. Its mediocre Urban Sophistication score of 50.55 suggests limited cultural and entertainment options for retirees. The median home price in Taunton is more affordable than many areas in Massachusetts, with recent reports showing prices around $580,000-$600,000, which has been increasing at a moderate rate.

15. Fitchburg

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 30.51
  • Walkability: 78.96
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 48.99
  • Vibrant Score: 65.77
  • Transit-Friendly: 33.27

About Fitchburg

Fitchburg ranks 15th on our list with a low Overall Retirement Score of 30.51. While it offers decent Walkability at 78.96, its disappointing Transit-Friendly score of 33.27 creates mobility challenges for seniors. The city’s Urban Sophistication score of just 48.99 indicates a lack of cultural amenities and services targeted toward retirees. Fitchburg remains one of the more affordable housing markets in Massachusetts, with median home prices that are lower than state averages, making it potentially attractive to budget-conscious retirees despite its drawbacks.

14. Southbridge

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 29.86
  • Walkability: 74.50
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 30.27
  • Vibrant Score: 55.98
  • Transit-Friendly: 11.48

About Southbridge

Southbridge presents significant challenges for retirees with an Overall Retirement Score of 29.86. Its extremely low Transit-Friendly score of 11.48 is concerning for seniors who may not drive, while its Urban Sophistication rating of just 30.27 suggests limited cultural enrichment opportunities. Though Walkability is reasonable at 74.50, the town’s overall amenities and services for retirees appear inadequate. Housing in Southbridge is more affordable compared to eastern Massachusetts communities, but the trade-off comes in reduced retirement-friendly infrastructure and services.

13. Boston

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 29.35
  • Walkability: 88.83
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 70.69
  • Vibrant Score: 86.72
  • Transit-Friendly: 88.77

About Boston

Boston’s place on this list may surprise many, with its Overall Retirement Score of just 29.35 despite excellent scores in other categories. While the city excels in Walkability (88.83), Transit-Friendly options (88.77), and Urban Sophistication (70.69), its high Vibrant Score of 86.72 indicates a fast-paced environment that may be overwhelming for retirees seeking tranquility. The median home price in Boston has reached approximately $835,709 as of March 2025, representing a 3.8% increase over the previous year, making affordability a major concern for retirees on fixed incomes.

12. Worcester

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 27.28
  • Walkability: 86.99
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 52.76
  • Vibrant Score: 80.13
  • Transit-Friendly: 53.82

About Worcester

Worcester ranks poorly for retirement with an Overall Retirement Score of 27.28. While it offers strong Walkability at 86.99, the city’s high Vibrant Score of 80.13 indicates a busy, potentially noisy environment less conducive to peaceful retirement living. Its average Urban Sophistication score of 52.76 suggests moderate but not exceptional cultural amenities. The median home price in Worcester reached approximately $454,321 as of February 2025, showing a significant 9.2% increase from the previous year, which continues to challenge retirees seeking affordable housing options in central Massachusetts.

11. Revere

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 27.26
  • Walkability: 85.05
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 62.49
  • Vibrant Score: 78.40
  • Transit-Friendly: 79.01

About Revere

Revere presents challenges for retirees with an Overall Retirement Score of 27.26. While the city offers good Transit-Friendly options at 79.01 and strong Walkability at 85.05, these positives are overshadowed by retirement-specific concerns. With a Vibrant Score of 78.40, the city may feel too busy and urban for those seeking a quiet retirement. Historical data shows Revere’s median home prices have been in the upper $400,000s to lower $500,000s, placing additional pressure on retirement budgets in this coastal community near Boston.

10. Fall River

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 23.79
  • Walkability: 89.91
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 36.24
  • Vibrant Score: 75.11
  • Transit-Friendly: 28.99

About Fall River

Fall River struggles significantly as a retirement destination with a low Overall Retirement Score of 23.79. While its Walkability score of 89.91 is impressive, the city’s low Urban Sophistication score of 36.24 indicates limited cultural and entertainment options for retirees. Its poor Transit-Friendly score of 28.99 presents mobility challenges for seniors who don’t drive. Housing in Fall River is more affordable than many Massachusetts communities, with median home prices that have been rising but remain lower than state averages, which may attract retirees on tight budgets despite the city’s drawbacks.

9. Holyoke

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 22.94
  • Walkability: 79.41
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 33.45
  • Vibrant Score: 73.64
  • Transit-Friendly: 45.53

About Holyoke

Holyoke presents significant challenges for retirees with a low Overall Retirement Score of 22.94. Its Urban Sophistication score of just 33.45 indicates limited cultural and entertainment options, while its mediocre Transit-Friendly rating of 45.53 may create transportation difficulties for non-driving seniors. The median home price in Holyoke was around $308,500 as of March 2025, showing a modest 2.9% increase from the previous year, making it one of the more affordable options on this list, though retirement quality of life concerns remain significant.

8. New Bedford

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 21.84
  • Walkability: 89.00
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 37.34
  • Vibrant Score: 76.10
  • Transit-Friendly: 39.23

About New Bedford

New Bedford ranks poorly for retirement with a low Overall Retirement Score of 21.84. While the city boasts excellent Walkability at 89.00, its low Urban Sophistication score of 37.34 suggests limited cultural amenities for retirees. The Transit-Friendly rating of just 39.23 indicates transportation challenges for seniors who no longer drive. New Bedford offers more affordable housing than many Massachusetts communities, with median home prices that have been rising but remain lower than state averages, potentially attracting retirees seeking lower housing costs despite the city’s drawbacks.

7. Lynn

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 20.80
  • Walkability: 93.10
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 53.53
  • Vibrant Score: 80.48
  • Transit-Friendly: 78.30

About Lynn

Lynn presents significant challenges for retirees with a very low Overall Retirement Score of 20.80. Despite excellent Walkability at 93.10 and good Transit-Friendly options at 78.30, other retirement-specific factors create concerns. The high Vibrant Score of 80.48 suggests a busy, potentially noisy urban environment that may not provide the peaceful atmosphere many retirees seek. Lynn’s median home prices have historically been in the $400,000-$500,000 range, making it relatively more affordable than many Boston-area communities, though housing costs continue to rise across the region.

6. Lowell

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 19.57
  • Walkability: 92.62
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 56.76
  • Vibrant Score: 84.10
  • Transit-Friendly: 62.19

About Lowell

Lowell ranks poorly for retirement with a very low Overall Retirement Score of 19.57. While the city offers excellent Walkability at 92.62 and reasonable Transit-Friendly options at 62.19, its high Vibrant Score of 84.10 indicates a busy, potentially stressful environment for retirees seeking tranquility. Recent data shows Lowell’s median home price reached $513,000 in January 2025, representing an 11.4% increase from the previous year, creating additional financial pressure for retirees on fixed incomes considering this northern Massachusetts city.

5. Brockton

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 18.41
  • Walkability: 83.50
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 52.23
  • Vibrant Score: 74.29
  • Transit-Friendly: 66.80

About Brockton

Brockton faces significant challenges as a retirement destination with a very low Overall Retirement Score of 18.41. Though the city has good Walkability at 83.50 and moderate Transit-Friendly options at 66.80, other retirement-specific factors create concerns. According to recent data, the median home price in Brockton reached $495,000 in January 2025, showing a 6.4% increase from the previous year. While more affordable than many Boston-area communities, the city’s retirement quality of life indicators suggest retirees may face challenges despite the relatively lower housing costs.

4. Everett

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 18.18
  • Walkability: 95.74
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 61.82
  • Vibrant Score: 88.02
  • Transit-Friendly: 86.88

About Everett

Everett ranks very poorly for retirement with an extremely low Overall Retirement Score of 18.18, despite having some of the highest scores in other categories. Its exceptional Walkability at 95.74 and strong Transit-Friendly rating of 86.88 are overshadowed by retirement-specific concerns. The very high Vibrant Score of 88.02 indicates an exceptionally busy, potentially noisy urban environment. Recent data shows Everett’s median home price at approximately $680,000 in February 2025, representing a significant 24.8% increase from the previous year, creating substantial affordability challenges for retirees.

3. Springfield

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 15.54
  • Walkability: 83.05
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 35.63
  • Vibrant Score: 74.25
  • Transit-Friendly: 46.68

About Springfield

Springfield ranks third worst for retirement in Massachusetts with an extremely low Overall Retirement Score of 15.54. While the city has good Walkability at 83.05, its low Urban Sophistication score of 35.63 indicates limited cultural amenities for retirees. The Transit-Friendly score of 46.68 suggests transportation challenges for seniors who don’t drive. Recent data shows the median home price in Springfield at approximately $300,724 as of January 2025, which is significantly more affordable than eastern Massachusetts communities, but retirement quality of life concerns remain substantial.

2. Chelsea

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 12.94
  • Walkability: 96.18
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 57.28
  • Vibrant Score: 88.91
  • Transit-Friendly: 91.67

About Chelsea

Chelsea ranks second worst for retirement in Massachusetts with an extremely low Overall Retirement Score of 12.94, despite having the highest scores in other categories on our list. Its near-perfect Walkability at 96.18 and outstanding Transit-Friendly rating of 91.67 are overshadowed by significant retirement-specific concerns. The extremely high Vibrant Score of 88.91 indicates a very busy, potentially stressful urban environment. Historical data has shown Chelsea’s median home prices in the upper $400,000s to lower $500,000s, making it relatively more affordable than many Boston-area communities but still presenting financial challenges for retirees.

1. Lawrence

Here are the key scores for this town:

  • Overall Retirement Score: 7.87
  • Walkability: 95.37
  • Urban Sophistication (Cultural amenities): 32.27
  • Vibrant Score: 86.17
  • Transit-Friendly: 56.37

About Lawrence

Lawrence ranks as the absolute worst town for retirement in Massachusetts with an incredibly low Overall Retirement Score of just 7.87. While the city boasts excellent Walkability at 95.37, its poor Urban Sophistication score of 32.27 indicates very limited cultural amenities for retirees. The extremely high Vibrant Score of 86.17 suggests a busy, potentially stressful urban environment. According to recent data, Lawrence’s median home price has reached approximately $500,000, representing a significant 70% increase over the past five years, creating substantial affordability challenges despite being lower than eastern Massachusetts averages…

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS