DUTTENHOFER: Library access should not come with a ‘study tax’

On May 7, I crawled out of the Clark stacks around midnight — bleary-eyed, head throbbing from a full week of exams and already dreaming of sleeping. Walking towards my car in the small lot behind Clark, I spotted it — a $65 parking ticket tucked beneath my windshield wiper. I had forgotten to add additional time onto my ParkMobile digital meter session. $65. My car was in a University-sanctioned spot. I was studying at a University library. It was the night before the last day of finals.

Although technically my fault, the incident reflects a larger issue festering on Grounds. Students are receiving financial penalties for parking at libraries. Almost every spot on Central Grounds opens to non-permit-holders after 5 p.m. for payment, and the few free spots closest to libraries fill up almost instantly. As a result, almost every spot located near a library comes at a price. For an institution that prides itself on academic ambition and community — that is a direct contradiction. The choice is simple — if you want to study, you pay. However, that choice becomes increasingly untenable during the most academically and emotionally taxing weeks of the year. If the University cares about their students in the ways that they claim, they should suspend parking enforcement at library locations during finals seasons, a move that costs little but means everything to students.

The most obvious damage the current system materializes is academic in nature. Libraries are the heart and soul of intellectual development and academic rigor, especially during finals. They boost collaboration, social interaction and increase work time — studying in groups, specifically, is scientifically proven to have a positive effect on both exam scores and mental health status. Accessible parking at libraries, therefore, is a critical factor in promoting that kind of interaction. If students who live far away — or drive to the library for any multitude of reasons — feel as though they are unable to park without paying the “study tax,” their alternative is studying alone in a dorm or an apartment. This default is detrimental, indirectly steering students toward habits like self-isolation and low-motivation while simultaneously discouraging new perspectives and an immediate support network. Quite evidently, parking fees and subsequent tickets discourage the academic behavior that the University claims to promote. If the University wants to continue championing academic excellence, then they cannot charge students for the privilege of pursuing it…

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS