Opinion: Rescinding roadless rule would harm Pisgah-Nantahala forests

Public lands are more than lines on a map. They are the wild, beating heart of these United States. They are living systems that house watersheds that nourish rivers, corridors that keep wildlife on the move, and the sacred spaces that remind us of who we are. Public lands are also nature’s infrastructure: they do the heavy lifting of carbon storage and water filtration without sending us a bill. Today, however, our treasured public lands are under siege.

For 25 years, the Roadless Area Conservation Rule has stood as a shield for the most intact forests we have left. Now, federal leaders want to scrap it. They claim it’s about “forest health” or “local control.” After two decades in public lands advocacy and wildlife protection, I can tell you this is just smoke and mirrors. This proposal relies on the dangerous ignorance of how forests function.

When the Roadless Rule was finalized in 2001, it wasn’t a backroom deal. It followed one of the largest public engagement processes in history — with 600 public hearings — and halted new roads and industrial logging on roughly 58 million acres. These aren’t random patches of trees; they’re the last unfragmented forests in the lower 48. In a world defined by environmental chaos, these lands aren’t ”surplus.” They are life rafts…

Story continues

TRENDING NOW

LATEST LOCAL NEWS